FYI.
I plan to attend; if anyone needs a ride, let me know.
William H. "Bus" Jaco
Regents Professor,
Grayce B. Kerr Chair, and
Head
Department of Mathematics
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rubin, Leonard R. <lrubin(a)ou.edu>
Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:48 PM
Subject: talk on Dehn-Kneser
To: "william.jaco(a)okstate.edu" <william.jaco(a)okstate.edu>
Cc: "rowe(a)mathematik.uni-mainz.de" <rowe(a)mathematik.uni-mainz.de>,
"Forester, Max B." <mf(a)ou.edu>
Bus: I just noticed on your math website that you are getting a very nice
award of recognition from your department. My congratulations.
I wanted to call your attention to a talk that will be given here in our
topology seminar on Wednesday, February 14 (see attached). David Rowe has
been studying correspondence that had occurred between Kneser and Dehn I
guess around 1929. It was at this time that Kneser had discovered a huge
gap in Dehn’s proof of what we call Dehn’s lemma. David is going to talk
about this. We are getting a great scoop because he has been invited by
Cameron Gordon to speak at the UT colloquium in March on this very same
topic.
I hope that you and some of your colleagues would be able to attend. Our
seminar usually begins at 3:45, but often when we have an outside speaker,
it starts at 4:00, leaving time before it to have tea and cookies. The
actual schedule has not yet been set. I kind of suggested to David that
this might be a little less formal and a little bit free-form in the sense
that some people might be there who could say at least a little bit about
how and why such a lemma has an impact on the topology of 3-manifolds. It
would be of interest to say something about why the loop theorem is
superior to Dehn’s lemma (I do not know these things), which I found out by
having a glance at John Hempel’s book.
OK, so let me know what you think about all this. I certainly hope that
you and others can attend. As usual, we would go out for dinner after the
talk.
Lenny