Tomorrow we have Josh Howie "coming" to speak at 3:45 central.
The meeting link will be https://meet.google.com/frv-bgow-byi
His title and abstract are below:
Alternating genera of torus knots
Speaker: Josh Howie, UC Davis
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Time: 3:45 PM
Room: https://meet.google.com/frv-bgow-byi
Abstract: The alternating genus of a knot is the minimum genus of a surface onto which the knot has an alternating diagram satisfying certain conditions. Very little is currently known about this knot invariant. We study spanning surfaces for knots and define an alternating distance from the extremal spanning surfaces. This gives a lower bound on the alternating genus and can be calculated exactly for torus knots. We prove that the alternating genus can be arbitrarily large, find the first examples of knots where the alternating genus is exactly 3, and classify all toroidally alternating torus knots.
______________________
Neil R. Hoffman
Assistant Professor
Department of Mathematics
523 Math Science Building
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK 74078-1058
405-744-7791
http://math.okstate.edu/people/nhoffman
Hello everyone,
Today's seminar will use the same link as last week:
meet.google.com/bqo-wbtp-gzj
Thomas Kindred from University of Nebraska will be joining us. His title and abstract are below:
A geometric proof of the flyping theorem
Speaker: Thomas Kindred, University of Nebraska
Date: Sep 9, 2020
Time: 3:45 PM
Room: Virtual meeting
Abstract: In 1898, Tait asserted several properties of alternating knot diagrams. These assertions came to be known as Tait’s conjectures and remained open through the discovery of the Jones polynomial in 1985. The new polynomial invariants soon led to proofs of all of Tait’s conjectures, culminating in 1993 with Menasco-Thistlethwaite’s proof of Tait’s flyping conjecture.
In 2017, Greene gave the first geometric proof of part of Tait’s conjectures, while also answering a longstanding question of Fox by characterizing alternating links geometrically; Howie independently answered Fox’s question with a related characterization. I will use these new characterizations, among other techniques, to give the first entirely geometric proof of Menasco-Thistlethwaite’s Flyping Theorem.
______________________
Neil R. Hoffman
Assistant Professor
Department of Mathematics
523 Math Science Building
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK 74078-1058
405-744-7791
http://math.okstate.edu/people/nhoffman
Hi all,
I will be speaking this week.
***Note the new Google Meet link:***
meet.google.com/bqo-wbtp-gzj
Title: From veering triangulations to Cannon-Thurston maps
Abstract: Agol introduced veering triangulations of mapping tori,
whose combinatorics are canonically associated to the pseudo-Anosov
monodromy. In previous work, Hodgson, Rubinstein, Tillmann and I found
examples of veering triangulations that are not layered and therefore
do not come from Agol’s construction.
However, non-layered veering triangulations retain many of the good
properties enjoyed by mapping tori. For example, Schleimer and I
constructed a canonical circular ordering of the cusps of the
universal cover of a veering triangulation. Its order completion gives
the veering circle; collapsing a pair of canonically defined
laminations gives a surjection onto the veering sphere.
In work in progress, Manning, Schleimer, and I prove that the veering
sphere is the Bowditch boundary of the manifold’s fundamental group.
As an application we produce Cannon-Thurston maps for all veering
triangulations. This gives the first examples of Cannon-Thurston maps
that do not come, even virtually, from surface subgroups.