next up previous contents index
Next: Faculty Up: Oklahoma State University Department Previous: Complex Analysis (Ph.D. and

The Graduate Committee

The Graduate Committee and its chairman, the graduate director , oversee the functioning of the Graduate Program. As such the Graduate Committee is involved with most aspects of the academic life of a graduate student in the Department from the first inquiry until graduation. Officially the Department has defined the role of the Graduate Committee (in May 1988) as follows:


The graduate committee has the responsibility for interpreting and executing the policies and procedures approved by the faculty for the administration of the graduate program. Among its duties are those of responding to inquiries, hearing appeals, organizing the comprehensive and language examinations and determining the results, making recommendations regarding assistantships,  fellowships, and awards, and consulting with the head, faculty, and graduate students on aspects of the program. In addition the committee may approve exceptions to the standard policies and procedures; however, it is expected that such exceptions will be approved only in rare, unusual, and compelling circumstances.


The statement above only provides a general description of the role of the graduate committe. Below are more detailed statements on the current implementation of our policies and procedures.


Recruiting and Responding To Inquiries


The Graduate Committee is charged with recruiting new graduate students. As part of a state supported institution the Department seeks qualified students from all segments of society. To build awareness of our programs the Graduate Committee advertises in selected publications and on the world wide web. The Committee encourages faculty, alumni, and current graduate students to help make prospective students aware of the quality of our programs. The Graduate Committee also contacts selected students who take the Putnam examination, the GRE, or otherwise indicate possible interest in pursuing an advanced degree in mathematics.


Once a student has shown further interest in our programs, an information and application packet is sent to the student. Additional contacts are made to ensure that the student's application is complete.


Admission to the Program


Admission is a joint responsibility of the Graduate College and the Department. Initially the student sends a completed application form (paper or electronic) to the Graduate College. The Graduate College has certain requirements that must be satisfied before admission is granted to any graduate program at the University. As a preliminary step the Graduate College will request official transcripts of college level work and, in the case of international students, a TOEFL score.


When sufficient information is available, the application is sent to the Department for a recommendation. The graduate director  and Graduate Committee members will examine the materials obtained by the Graduate College and other materials that have been sent to the Department. These materials may include personal statements by the applicant, letters of reference, descriptions of course work completed, and GRE scores. The graduate director will either hold the application for comparison with future applicants, recommend approval of the admission to the requested program or a different program without qualification, recommend admission conditionally, or recommend that admission be denied. The decision is primarily based on whether there is sufficient space in the program and whether the applicant's past accomplishments indicate that they can successfully complete the program.


The Dean of the Graduate College makes the final decision on admission. Many times admission is granted based on incomplete information. For example a student might be in the last semester of his undergraduate studies and thus does not yet have a bachelor's degree or, a TOEFL score may not be available. In these cases admission is sometimes approved on the assumption that by the time the student begins study the materials will have been received by the Graduate College. The Graduate College may revoke admission if the materials are not eventually received.


Teaching Assistantships and Other Financial Support


Most graduate students do not have the financial resources to pursue their studies without support from the Department. The Department has a limited number of teaching assistantships, fellowships and research assistantships that can be used to support  graduate students while they study. The stipend for these is sufficient to support a modest life-style and cover the cost of study. A TA is employed at a 50% level and receives a waiver  for non-resident fees. Additional fee waivers are available for domestic students from the Department and the Graduate College. Because all of these funds are limited an important responsibility of the Graduate Committee is to recommend students for support. The same materials used for the admission recommendation are employed in making these recommendations for new students. For continuing students the Graduate Committee also examines the progress of the student's studies and their past performance as a teaching assistant. Because these decisions involve the commitment of funds, the Department Head actually makes the offers with the approval of those administators having fiduciary responsibilties. For most students these decisions are made in the Spring.


Academic Advising


Throughout a graduate student's studies the Graduate Committee serves as a source of information and advice. Once students have been admitted to the program, the primary concern of the Graduate Committee is that the graduate students receive a quality education and complete their studies in a timely manner. At the beginning of student's program a member of the Graduate Committee will serve as academic advisor. The advisor will help the student plan his or her first year or two of study and complete enrollment forms. The initial advising session is particularly critical so that the student will begin his graduate studies at an appropriate level and acquire the prerequisites for later work.


After a student has formed a master's or doctoral committee,   most of the advising will be transferred to the chairman of his committee. Nonetheless, the members of the Graduate Committee will still be available to counsel the student, advise the student academically when his committee members are not available and explain degree requirements.


Graduate Examinations


The Graduate Committee is responsible for scheduling, administering, and determining the results of the written exams  for each degree program. The syllabus for the exams is periodically reviewed by the Graduate Committee however any signifcant changes in the syllabus must be approved by the Department. The examinations are written and graded by qualified members of the Department. In general the examination will not be tailored to the associated course, but rather to the exam syllabus. To help ensure the integrity of the exam results, the exams and results are determined without specific identification of the student. The Graduate Committee reviews each exam for adherence to the syllabus and level of difficulty before making its final determination of the results. After the exam results are determined, the students may wish to review their performance with the graduate director or another member of the Graduate Committee. The Graduate Committee member will also advise the student as to the import of the results for their program of study.


Appeals


Occasionally a student may feel that a decision of the Graduate Committee or his program committee was unfair, incorrect or that they were special circumstances which were not considered. The student should then bring their concerns to the attention of the Graduate Committee. Generally the student should discuss the situation with the graduate director and then write a formal letter to the Graduate Committee which describes the request and the justifications for the appeal. The Graduate Committee will consider the issues and decide if any relief is warranted. Such matters are generally of a serious nature and may have consequences far beyond the case at hand. Thus exceptions to stated policy and procedure are granted rarely and only for compelling reasons.


Special Awards and Doctoral Teaching Reductions


Each Spring the Graduate Committee meets to determine the winners of various Departmental awards  for graduate students. The meeting will be announced well in advance so that nominations for the awards may be received and supporting information can be gathered. All of these awards are based on merit. The Doctoral Teaching Reductions are given to students who are working on their thesis. The major factor in these decisions is the case for support made by the thesis advisor.


Review of Students' Progress


At least once a year the Graduate Committee examines the progress toward degree that each student has made. In order that the information used be accurate it is important that the graduate director be informed whenever a significant step in the program is completed. (Because some of these items are scheduled by the advisor with the Graduate College, the Graduate Committee may not receive notification.) While this is primarily the responsibility of the advisor, the student can also aid in this process. This determination by the Graduate Committee may be used in deciding reappointments, stipend increases, teaching loads, and continuation in the program. 

Evaluation of Progress Toward Graduate Degrees


A myriad of factors such as coursework completed, grades,  and opinions of instructors and advisors are employed by the Graduate Committee in evaluating a student's progress. If unsatisfactory performance is indicated by any of these factors, the Graduate Committee may question whether funding  for the student should be continued.

One factor that the Graduate Committee uses is the timely completion of certain significant milestones in the program. The timetables below give benchmarks for good and satisfactory completion periods for these milestones. A student whose progress to date is slower than that indicated as satisfactory should be aware that a recommendation for continued funding is uncertain.

Below core courses refers to those courses which prepare a students for the written examinations for the particular degree program and option. For example, in the pure option of the master's program the core courses would be Advanced Calculus I & II, Modern Algebra I & II, and General Topology.

Timetable for the Master's Program

  A student in the master's program is on a timetable corresponding to good progress in the program if:

Year 1:
The core courses are completed.
Year 2:
The exams and other requirements are completed.

A student in the master's program is on a timetable corresponding to satisfactory progress if:

Year 2:
The core courses are completed.
Year 3:
The exams and other requirements are completed.

Normally, a student in the master's program will be funded for at most three years.

Timetable for the Ph.D. Program

  The timetables below assume that the student enters the Ph.D. program with a bachelor's degree. A student who enters the Ph.D. program after completing some graduate work in mathematics may be expected to follow a timetable that is shorter than these. This would depend on the background of the student and thus would be individually determined.

A student in the Ph.D. program is on a timetable corresponding to good progress if:

Year 2:
The core courses are completed.
Year 3:
The written exams are completed.
Year 4:
The qualifying exam is passed.
Year 6:
The dissertation is completed.

A student in the Ph.D. program is on a timetable corresponding to satisfactory progress if:

Year 3:
The core courses are completed.
Year 4:
The written exams are completed.
Year 5:
The qualifying exam is passed.
Year 7:
The dissertation is completed.

The determination of the progress of a student in the Ph.D. program after the written exams are completed is necessarily based to a large extent on the opinion of the advisor.


next up previous contents index
Next: Faculty Up: Oklahoma State University Department Previous: Complex Analysis (Ph.D. and
graddir
2000-05-08